SOURCE CONTEXT
The selected passage is highlighted. Adjacent passages preserve the surrounding source text.
SHE 39:10 difficulty in explaining this comes with trying to put into space and into time that which is neither spatial nor having time. But it is possible to give some explanation. You were wondering about the the spaces on either side and the space is out in all directions around the level that you are on is that correct? 39:39 Yes.
SHE 39:42 It is like this like us. I must find the words your form of existence is But a small vibration in that of the entire cosmos and yet it is very important because you have the ability to transcend all levels. Many other forms of existence do not have this ability, but your form of consciousness does our form of consciousness mine is also the same. Therefore, we are in significantly small and infinitely great to either side as a level that you are on our beings who have either just made the transition from physical life and stiff or beings who are about to incarnate and they are they are there feeling the vibrations from you. So, that they may make their transition either on into higher levels after death or into that particular vibrational level as they come into life. But even life and death are not valid terms, because there's only life or there's only death depending upon how you choose to look at it.
Robert Monroe 41:38 From our spatial point of view, it is conceivable that to one side in any side or what we might label front or back are are actually the levels as it were 22 to 28 expanding in all directions would that be closer to it? Again, I recognize the problem thinking terms of spaciality is if the circle in which we are working or the the circle of seven as to where is a sphere and then we are in cased in spheres moving outward Is that another way of saying