← Explore the sources

SOURCE CONTEXT

Spatial Angle Modulation

The selected passage is highlighted. Adjacent passages preserve the surrounding source text.

Markdown lines 83–89 · Speaker unresolvedOpen

SAM is described as an audio support for exploring awareness, not a medical treatment, and Lane's three studies did not demonstrate powerful relaxation effects. If you have a seizure disorder, a serious mental-health condition, or any doubt about whether audio programs are right for you, read the publisher's guidance and talk to your clinician first. What is Spatial Angle Modulation (SAM)? Spatial Angle Modulation, or SAM, is an audio method the Monroe Institute began investigating in 2008 as a complement to Hemi-Sync. Instead of two tones beating against each other, it uses a single tone that is digitally moved around the stereo field, fast enough that the listener hears a tremolo, a rapid flutter in the tone. Skip Atwater and co-inventor Mike Turner developed it, and Atwater described the design in the Institute's 2012 TMI Journal. Nancy McMoneagle summed it up in an interview posted in 2017 as a single tone that, at least as it sounds, is moving through space. It appears in some Institute programs, alone or layered with music, nature sounds and spoken guidance. How is SAM different from Hemi-Sync and binaural beats?

Markdown lines 91–97 · Speaker unresolvedSelected evidence

Hemi-Sync builds on binaural beats: two slightly different tones, one per ear, produce a perceived beat, and recordings typically add pink noise and a spoken guide, as A.J. Honeycutt described in 2014. SAM uses one tone whose apparent position sweeps through stereo space, and the tremolo that results is what the design relies on. Atwater's 2012 article counts five adjustable settings for SAM against two for binaural beats, and says the Institute does not suppose SAM entrains brainwaves the way the binaural-beat model does. The two are meant to complement each other, and SAM can be layered with the same music, background sounds and narration. Does SAM work better than Hemi-Sync? The studies Institute speakers have described do not show that. Atwater's 2012 article claims SAM acts faster and more flexibly than other audio methods, but it is a design rationale with no comparative data, and it expected objective evidence to come from later studies. James Lane tried to demonstrate SAM's relaxation effects in three studies and said they were not really successful in showing powerful effects; his later questionnaire pilot had no control group. Without a head-to-head test using the same listeners and the same outcomes, the claim that SAM beats Hemi-Sync is a hypothesis. Has SAM been studied?

Markdown lines 99–105 · Speaker unresolvedOpen

Some work has been reported, mostly by James Lane in an Institute talk posted in 2018. He ran three studies looking for relaxation effects, hoping SAM could be used in places like patient waiting rooms, and said they were not really successful in showing powerful effects. He then gave a 30-item mystical experience questionnaire to 14 participants in a five-day program: seven met the criterion for a complete mystical experience, two did not, and several came close. Lane stressed that it was a small study without controls and that most participants were experienced with Institute programs. In 2012 Atwater expected objective evidence from ongoing studies of gamma synchrony. Which Monroe Institute programs use SAM? Nancy McMoneagle said in a podcast posted in 2016 that Event Horizon, a program designed by Bob Holbrook, is based on the Institute's spatial angle modulation audio, and James Lane's talk, posted in 2018, about experiences at Institute programs is titled "SAM-supported mystical experiences." Those two sources name no other SAM programs, so check a program's own description. The Institute also uses Hemi-Sync and the broader label Monroe Sound Science. Is SAM the same as Monroe Sound Science?