1976-02-26 TC

1976-02-26 TC (This is an unedited transcript, auto generated by otter.ai.) PC, 220, 30, going out in that right handed direction does seem to help keep the communication to a single source. I have found such source. I believe it is the same source contacted earlier, the same one contacted last week, I asked the source of questions. The first was that in an aid to help us improve our communications. What kind of things could we work on? What kind of events could Should we try to predict? And he agreed that natural events were the best candidates, and he offered several he did not use the weather he owns, like unusual, uh, happens, like a major limb falling off a tree, flat tires, particular light bulbs, burning out, things that were wearing out and about to break, seemed to be The area that he picked. And the idea was to scour a house or several locations for such unusual physical things. Personally, I don't know how easy it will be for a human to relate to these non human objective articles and ascertain much about them, but that were his suggestions. Next I asked him some harder questions, such as just who he was and what he was doing there, and where he came from, a little bit of identity. And I didn't get much of an answer on that. It was mostly, I'm here. I exist in your mind and out of it, and a lot of other things like that that didn't particularly make useful sense to me. Then I asked him how he got his information. How do you know, or how do you know these future things or past things? What's your source? And I did get an answer on this, and not a particularly illuminating one, but he just seemed to say, well, you know, it's right there. It's obvious, it's right in front of me. I just know that, you know, like, how do you ask me how it is I know. Just like somebody would say, Well, how do you know that it's nighttime or daytime? And you would say, Well, I just, I just know it's obvious, it's so I definitely had the feeling that this information was just the commonest of Common knowledge. End of report. Do you have particular questions this year, 1976 I saw a map of the US, which was how I was receiving my information, and I got a big white, hazy splotch over the Northwest us. I don't know exactly how to interpret that, whether that means snow or or excessive. A rain or maybe snow, I don't know, but it was up in the northwest, centered maybe in the not real near the coast, sort of like in Wyoming, centered around Yellowstone in Wyoming, that area Northwest, big, white, hazy, cloudy splotch over that part of the country. 1977 the attention on a map was drawn to the Midwest and and it seemed that the that the trouble there was drought, that there was little water, and that the crops were not doing very well. A bed here in the Midwest. 78 just saw that trend continue. Still I haven't seen any major trauma. 79 i is when things seem to start to get shaky and like the map would would like shake and quiver. I got the idea of some kind of traumatic geological happening 79 and 80 the then I went further ahead, and things seemed to stay pretty calm until I got to about 1990 and 1995 where again, I got similar traumatic events, not that the same events reoccurred, but that some sort of traumatic geological things were taking place then too. I went back over these several times, and the basic communications remained the same. Remained the same each time, End of report, several things. Back to the maps again, there was one thing geologically that I'd forgotten the last time, and that is, and it reappeared, is why I remembered it. In about 78 I got a very light colored streak running north and south, just a little east of the Rockies, sort of in the Rocky Mountains. I don't know what that is exactly, whether that was water or maybe the Colorado River getting much bigger, but some kind of different or some kind of problem or unusual conditions in the Rocky Mountains, area from where the Rockies get started, around Nevada or so on out to Colorado, not the far west coast, though, so it's further inland, going on to political things. I didn't see any in the next five years or so, I didn't see any great political changes in that. The government didn't have any coups or there were no massive changes politically, then I change from politically, which is a pretty narrow question, to sociologically and psychologically. The greatest changes seem to be sociologically. And I got the feeling that this this year, and a little to a lesser extent the next year, and a lesser extent the next year after that, that would be 7677 and 78 would be the last, really, I. Of what we would consider now to be normal, normal years that change is going to be coming very rapidly. Things will be happening drastic. Things are are expected, like at an ever increasing rate, and that this year will be kind of easy, and next year a little less, and it'll be a sort of gradual, not just all of a sudden, Will everything fall to pieces, but it's definitely on the downhill run. So the trauma seemed to be projected, increasing from now, but not really severe until about 7879 and of course, a great deal of sociological and psychological trauma at 1980 to go along with the geological problem, I seem to get the name of Ford For the next President indicated he would retain the presidency. There was a name that I had gotten before, not this reporting time, but the time before this one. And I tried to recapture that name and get it again. I forgot to report it the first time, and it slipped away from me. It was a unusual name, one that I had never heard before, and as far as I know, has nothing to do with politics, and the best as I could remember, it was something like Howard or Hugo. I'll see if I can cannot get that back end of her.