← Library

SOURCE MARKDOWN

Explorers Project Reporter: Mike Turner

Date unknown

Open original source on Internet Archive ↗

This is existing source text. OCR and automatic-caption errors may remain. Collection notes and project summaries are excluded from this reader.

Recorded provenance: none · Quality: unknown. Use source-scoped search to inspect indexed evidence, or Ask for a cited summary.

IMEC-091 Channeled discussion of remote viewing (Summary) .pdf

ORIGINAL FILES

Open directly on Internet Archive in a new tab.

Markdown lines 128–157 · Part 1 of 1

IMEC (Marie Cobel) with “Friends” July 12, 1985 Session 91: Channeled Discussion of Remote Viewing Summary: Early part of this tape is a really good overview of remote viewing, as it is often described today, including reporting observations versus analyzing and the importance if imaging rather than interpretation, and the importance of intent. Emotional things (“target” as RV folks would call it) are easier to get than concepts. There is even a discussion of what RV folks would call analytical overlay when Marie says the mental body tends to intrude and take over. Later part of tape is more rambling and repetitive and drifts away from remote viewing at the end. 1:00: Yes, subject can do remote viewing. There is a good discussion of the observation/reporting mechanism of RV versus analysis. Experience and imaging is key, rather than interpretation. Intent is very important. It is much easier to remote view things with high emotional content than intellectual concepts. We are told that the mental body tends to try to intrude and “take over” [essentially what RV folks would call analytical overlay]. But we are told ego must eventually be involved, also. The RV work should be done by subject Marie herself, rather than by channeled entities. 1:20:00: Sudden drift over into a discussion of spirituality versus religion. Report from Mike Turner