Highlighted name: Nancy “Scooter” McMoneagle. A mention does not establish authorship. Back to profile →
Markdown lines 357–590 · Part 2 of 4
which the brain sorts out and organizes for our use the many
sensations we receive. It enables us to focus attention selec-
tively and reduce awareness of sensory input that is temporar-
ily unimportant. It allows us to “put together” parts to create a
whole. It attaches meaning to sensations through comparing
them with past experiences. It enables high levels of motor
coordination. It is the basis of perception.
There is a continuum of skill in sensory processing and
integration. Individuals experience varying degrees of sensory
organization and integration. None of us organizes sensations
perfectly or consistently. A high level of sensory integration
may enable an individual to be a skilled gymnast, an artist, or a
business entrepreneur. Most of us have average abilities in this
area. The normally functioning person with low normal sen-
sory integration may be physically clumsy or dislike being ina
noisy environment.
Variations are also present within the same individual. A
high level of sensorimotor skill and sensory integration can be
reflected in sports performance in the individual who also has
a low level of sensory integration for reading skills.
Each of us has a range of internal variability in the skill
with which we organize and respond to our sensory world. Our
language contains expressions which reflect this range of
personal experience. Comments such as “I just couldn’t get it
all together,” “I felt especially touchy about that,” or “I feel as
if I'm on overload” reflect our experience with the lower
ranges of sensory processing and integration. For most of us
this is a transient state triggered by fatigue, overwork, or a
situation which places high demands on the ability to focus
attention and reduce distractions. The threshold for moving
into sensory overload with reduced sensory integrative skills
varies greatly among individuals. One person may experiencea
high level of energy anda normal ability to focus the attention
at a complex business meeting or a convention. Another
person in the same environment may experience fatigue and
confusion.
When children or adults experience sensory integrative
difficulties, the brain does not process or organize the flow of
sensory impulses in a way that gives them precise information
about themselves and the world. Learning is difficult and
individuals often feel uncomfortable with themselves and have
difficulty coping with stress and demands. This. often results in
additional emotional or behavioral difficulties. If this is a
temporary situation, the individual may feel frustrated, dis-
couraged, or antisocial. If these experiences recur frequently
or in specific situations, situations that are associated with
reduced functioning, they may be consciously avoided.
--- PAGE 4 (OCR) ---
HEMI-SYNC JOURNAL
NEUROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION
AND SENSORY INTEGRATION
Sensory integration occurs at all levels of the central
nervous system. However, the brain stem (including the
midbrain, pons, and medulla oblongata) appears to play the
most significant role in sensory processing. The brain stem
and the thalamus receive sensory information from every
sensory modality. Information passing through these struc-
tures is modified, integrated with other sensory information,
and directed to the brain’s cortex.
As multiple sensory information impinges upon the brain,
a finely tuned filter system comes into play. Sensory input
pertinent to the individual's inner needs and goals reaches a
level of consciousness. Input which is less important or dis-
tracting is dampened down centrally. The reticular formation
in the brain stem (which plays the central role in this filter
system) is often considered the master control mechanism of
the central nervous system. It helps the brain to focus on one
type of sensory input by inhibiting other types of input. This
allows the individual to focus attention, and reduces the level
of distraction.
Children who have been labeled hyperactive or individuals
temporarily on sensory overload are unsuccessful in filtering
out irrelevant information. They are pulled from one experi-
ence to the next and are unable to maintain the focus of
attention needed for successful learning. If the overloading
situation is sustained or occurs frequently, the individual
usually discovers ways of reducing or deadening the sensory
input. An autistic child may retreat to an inner world through
organizing or hypnotic activities such as rocking, rhythmical
spinning of objects or flapping fingers, avoiding eye contact, or
hyperventilating breathing patterns. A normal adult, experi-
encing a reduction in the ability to filter sensory input and
Poor sensory integration may use variations of the same
strategies. They may find eye contact more difficult, move to
an inattentive world of daydreaming, or use alcohol or drugs to
deaden the senses and find greater internal calmness.
HEMI-SYNC AND SENSORY INTEGRATION
Hemi-Sync is an excellent example of the sensory integra-
tive process of the brain. Two independent auditory signals are
integrated in a way that produces a whole (i.e., Hemi-Sync)
which is different from each of the separate parts. Initial
processing and integration occurs in the brain stem. In addi-
tion, the tendency toward synchronization of the right and left
hemispheres appears to enhance attention, sensory and ex-
trasensory awareness, and intuitive processing, and to in-
crease successful adaptation to personal experiences.
Since 1981 I have been using Hemi-Sync with young
children who experience sensorimotor and sensory integrative
disabilities. Both clinical experience and preliminary research
indicate that the addition of Hemi-Sync signals (containing
frequencies which produce more theta patterns in the brain)
to background music increases the child’s focus of attention,
calms the emotions, and creates a mental set of open receptiv-
ity. These responses are consistent with those reported by
adults using Hemi-Sync tapes during their GATEWAY VOY-
AGE experience.
However, an unexpected response was seen in children
who, prior to Hemi-Sync therapy, experienced severe difficul-
ties with sensory organization and integration. These children
showed major difficulties accepting touch to their bodies.
Gentle hugs, light calming strokes or pats, or accidental
touching usually elicited strong aversive reactions. The child
would push the touching person away, screech or cry, hit the
person, or withdraw and begin a series of stereotyped self-
stimulatory behaviors. They did not like to get their hands
messy, have their hair washed or combed, or sit outside in the
wind and grass. Many of the children became frightened and
disoriented with movement or changes of position. They
tended to increase these behaviors in complex sensory envi-
ronments. A busy household, a school classroom or cafeteria,
or a trip to the grocery store would reduce the child’s ability to
function and would increase the frequency and strength of the
behaviors used to cope. Because of the intensity of their
reactions to their environment, most of these children were
labeled autistic, profoundly retarded, or emotionally
disturbed.
When Hemi-Sync was added to therapy and classroom
environments, these children responded in a totally different
way. Eye contact increased. They accepted touch and became
curious and interested in the sensory input. They were no
longer startling and putting their hands over their ears to
sounds that were previously upsetting. The amount of frus-
trated screeching and crying was reduced, and more func-
tional communication emerged. There was a reduction in
behaviors previously used by the child to cope with sensory
overload. The children stopped rocking, spinning, and flap-
ping and began to pay attention.
A new set of questions emerged from these experiences. It
appeared that the Hemi-Sync signals enhanced the child’s
ability to organize and integrate sensory information. This
resulted in an increase in the ability to focus attention, to
discriminate specific sensory properties, and to filter un-
wanted sensory input. What were these children telling us
about the use of Hemi-Sync in our own lives?
A PERSONAL EXPERIENCE: HEMI-SYNC
AND SENSORY ORGANIZATION
For most of my life I have experienced sharp swings in my
ability to organize the sensory environment. I have always
functioned best in quiet spaces. When sensory complexity is
reduced, I am able to think more clearly, and to be more
creative. It is as if a reduction in external stimulation allows
inner connections to be stronger, and increases my awareness
of inner messages and intuitive insights. Many noisy and
complex experiences caused fatigue and internal frustration as
I was growing up. The noise and natural exuberance of a
football game, the chatter of a party, the external complexity of
a business meeting or convention triggered an intense experi-
ence of overload. I was painfully aware of inner confusion, of
misunderstanding what people said, of poor memory, of re-
duced eye contact, of being physically and emotionally touchy,
and of the body-aching fatigue that usually resulted from such
encounters. The fatigue and a desire to go to sleep were always
Present, and as they became stronger, I was aware of even
poorer abilities to cope with the situation. I participated in a
limited way in these activities, but was always the first to go
home, or the one who fell asleep in the middle ofa party. Iwas
painfully shy, and very much of an introvert. Some people
described me as antisocial. In quieter situations I was comfort-
able and outgoing. The world seemed to make more sense, and
relationships with other people were easy and pleasurable.
--- PAGE 5 (OCR) ---
Winter 1991
My initial participation in the GATEWAY VOYAGE in the
spring of 1981 facilitated a different set of responses to my
normal environment. I first noticed it during the plane trip
home. I generally experienced airports as extremely stressful
places. The bustle of people, the overwhelming smells from
snack bars, and the random announcements of plane depar-
tures required a good bit of conscious focusing and sorting out
to get me to my destination. I arrived home from that trip ina
calm and peaceful state of mind and body. I noticed this
change with interest, but thought little about it.
Iwas working in a hospital clinic for children with cerebral
palsy at the time. On clinic days my ability to function effi-
ciently was pushed to the maximum. In a five-hour period, I
might see six children for evaluations. There was no real
schedule, anda therapist would just pick up the next child who
was ready. Thus, there was no way of preparing for a specific
child. This was followed by a staffing session in which five or
six different professionals would discuss findings on each child
and decide upon a set of recommendations. This meeting was
usually chaotic, and interspersed with ringing telephones and
a general sense of impatience. At the end of the meeting I was
expected to type a brief report for each child while sitting in an
office with two other persons who were writing reports or
talking on the telephone. I was exhausted and constantly
frustrated with what I had agreed to do. After my GATEWAY
program, I had some new tools. I listened to a METAMUSIC
tape through my Walkman™ as I prepared for the ic day. I
found a quiet therapy room during lunchtime and listened to
the Catnapper tape before the staff meeting. I wore head-
phones and was supported by the Concentration tape while
writing reports.
As I included at least an hour of Hemi-Sync listening a day,
I found myself able to deal easily with most parties, sports
events, and shopping trips without specific preparation. My
life and perspective expanded. The ease with which I commu-
nicated during professional workshops and responded to ques-
tions from a large group increased perceptibly. My personal