Explorer IMEC Audio Files, Transcripts & Summaries (Sessions 151-175)

IMEC (Marie Coble) with “Friends” October 12, 1985 Session 157: Judgement Original Question: What is judgement? Summary: Is judgement a product of the mental body, an aspect that we have created? Judgement is differentiated from knowledge when it is in a form of a preference. Those seeking knowledge, will take all information in as information. Judgement is where there is a preference of one source over another source. Review: How does that differ from simply choosing? Choosing is proper when you are not choosing from a judgement. The fine line is in having a preference because you have moved out of a neutral state. The ceasing of preference is allowing. To allow the condition to take place to unfold as it is expressed. Allowing is also the act of faith. Faith is knowing and accepting. If you can allow what is occurring around you, with no fear, with no thought of consequence. When you see an action you want to immediately judge it as good or bad. This judgement then creates a consequence. The response is generally of fear from the survival point of view. The judgement is typically from a hidden aspective quality that is producing the behavior. Faith is required to allow the event to happen and not judge it. To remain neutral and step aside and watch it from a being of the observer. This idea of knowing the source of your thoughts is fundamental to building sound ideas. You have to give the intellect a sound premises to build upon. Build upon a firm foundation. 6:30 Is your thinking coming from an aspect or is it coming from your consciousness? If you allow other possibilities that are unsound to be built upon then what you build will fail. The visualization process for example, nothing can hurt you if you do not believe it. If that is the premises that he mental body is built upon then it would not even allow the attention to dwell on what another individual is doing. It is the structure of your belief systems that give it credibility. For example, the sciences. If some information comes forth that a certain thing is bad for your health, and it comes from a scientist then you give it credibility. It then causes a conflict with what you already know and you will have to accept or reject his information. You must recognize this and determine if the conflict is your own thinking or if it is aspective. Rather than initially judging the information, step aside and reserve judgement. Create the possibility for another way of thinking about the subject. When you build a reality it is important to give yourself the possibility for expansion for further growth. If you already have a belief system then create the possibility for additional understanding through discovering the source of the information. Understand the limitations of language and the limitations of the writer to express the concept. Ultimately it is a matter of faith as to what you believe because you will discover inconsistencies. Any concept developed in the mental body will find an opposite to negate it. If you read the material of another system you will try to make it fit into what you believe or you will try to destroy that system. 12:40 If you will not allow others to have this flexibility then you will not give yourself the same privilege. You must transcend the emotional and mental body. Look past the aspects the words and the projections of others realizing that they do not represent a threat to your stability. There are some religious that do not allow their members to read any other books about other systems. Because they wish to avoid the possibility of question arising in the members. By removing the knowledge they remove the possibility to question. There is no place in your mental body that adding move information will you find rest. You will always have more questions as this is the nature of the mental body. New knowledge comes from the resistance and conflict of ideas, opinions and concepts. You are only where you are through conflict. This is where the misunderstanding of suffering comes into play. Those who suffer do so in an effort to attain understanding. It is not physical suffering but the process of working through the conflict of aspective energies that surround one. It does not have to be as suffering or as a conflict. If the consciousness has the knowledge of aspects it can rise above it and assimilate it into new knowledge. When one resists you, in your aspective qualities, you can look at it as an adventure in learning. Or you can look at it as a fight and a suffering. When one suffers for a cause it confirms they are right because of the resistance. It is not designed that one has to suffer, physically, emotionally or mentally for the sake of knowledge. It appears to be that way because of the aspects that have the attention of the individual. It is through the resistance that the suffering appears. It is the act of the interactions of the aspects that brings about the evolution of the mind. If you think about this in terms of chemistry. One substance is mixed with another and both substances are destroyed to create a new substance. For the mental body one idea is mixed with another and both are changed to create another understanding in the mind. If you exchange one dogmatic system for another, that is saying the same thing in different words, then you are still trapped. The goal is to use your current understanding as a mental aid to reach a higher level of understanding. Sometime moving from one religious thought to another brings about this understanding. This is why you should not attack a system; someone is receiving some benefit from the study of that system. We are trying very hard for this channeling not to become a system. Our aim is for the information to free you from dogma, not create more. The point is to see some benefit from that which once to irritated you. When a bug lands and bites we hit them. Is this contrary to allowing? If your belief system holds this to be true, then that is what you have. But this seems contrary to a physical existence because you have to breath, eat and in doing so other life is destroyed. You have to ask if this is wrong then why is it wrong. There is belief that a difference exists between levels of consciousness, and it is okay to eat what is of a lower life form. All you have to do is release your thought structures. Allow the knowing to take place and let it become a part of your attention. The information will be revealed to you. Knowing is within. Aspects and thought pattern manifest through the physical body. But they still cannot conceive of the idea that thought forms coming from entities outside could come under the same wording as aspects. That Aspects can take on a negative quality that one is trying to overcome. So long as you view the Earth plane in any negative way that has to be overcome, you are rejecting a part of the creation of the whole. You will therefore reject the being outside as a place to go. The uncreated force is within you at all times. When aspects are created, they use the uncreated energy as their source? An aspect cannot manifest without a consciousness concentrating on it. You should only be concerned with your reality. If you see it in your brother than it is because it is being projected on to your brother and it is taking your attention by showing itself in another person. Aspects are supported through the uncreated force then subordinate through your consciousness. Because you are created, you are dependent. Your physical body as an example, is supported by the four elements. Your aspects need your support to survive. But they are sub-creations from the uncreated energy. When you do not take responsibility of directing them, they then have access to the uncreated energy that you are not utilizing, they will then work automatically on whatever programming has been allowed to come forth from them. This is a big part of reality because whether you have agreed to it or not by allowing the automatic processes to work through subliminal processing or a prior belief system. As discussed earlier the credibility of the scientific field is an aspective quality. When you hear something from a scientist it goes into your being and is given resonance by the aspects that agree with it. Is it possible for an individual to consciously withdraw their energy from this aspect? There will not be the need to deny it. The consciousness observing and giving direction to such information. It is observed and not consumed. The consuming of the information brings about the aspect creation. The observing means that no aspect will act on the information until it is given the command by the consciousness. When the consciousness is in control then an aspect is only called forth when an idea is needed to be expressed. When you are in control of your consciousness you are in control of all your aspect energy. 41:24 You then and only then can you deal with your brother externally. As you change your internal world you external world will automatically change. Once you have released an aspect you will be able to bring understanding to an individual without a conflict. You would be able to communicate the pure knowledge. There would not exist within you any thought of reprimand or any thought of fear. If you tell your brother, he has a choice then you have freed him. Anytime you use fear to communicate you have invoked fear in your brother. How do we separate beliefs and concepts from knowing? This is where patience come into play. When one can wait before responding. When one is in a conversation and the words are flowing rapidly, and you find you are in a debate. If you are asked a question and you immediately respond it is through an emotional belief system. You will begin to recognize it as aspective. This is when you pause. It will seem strange. But hold and wait for the consciousness take control. Then take into consideration the three points of the triangle. In the first position place the uncreated force. On the second point place understanding. The energy produced on the third point will be a communication in sync with the aspective qualities of that individual. Thereby the communication would come from the higher sources. You can bring in all information on the subject. You might find that there is equal amounts of both sides and therefore a conclusion is not possible. The mental body will come up with an answer whether it is right or wrong. The point is to speak at the level that the other person will understand. The importance is to convey meaning not to impress the person you are speaking to. Report by Daniel Erickson