2010 Professional Seminar: Entrained Mental Coherence Random Systems (Skip Atwater)

2010 Professional Seminar: Entrained Mental Coherence Random Systems (Skip Atwater) (Transcript) NOTE: This is an unedited transcript – it is exactly as created by otter.ai. 00:00 Everybody have a nice break? Good. Yeah, they're too short. Life's too long. 00:10 Six hours. TMI, professional weekday? How do we 00:16 get it set up portable headphones and stay in 15 all the time. 00:26 Okay, I'm going to introduce the next speaker. And this obviously be the most spectacular talk you've ever done. Because it's such a dynamic speaker. I've asked Tom to tether him here to the room because I need to use his expertise in part of this talk, which this whole idea of oh my goodness, I have to change everything I was gonna say because of what Tom said. All happened in the shower this morning. So I need is, is well, all my thoughts went down the drain anyway. So yes. I'm going to cover an interesting concept and study. 01:31 Study real published, peer reviewed, Latin, derive hyphenated words, things like that. I'll pass this out later. Are all paths out later? You're all familiar with? Well, let me start with, I'll start with the lead and then refer back to it. When I go to Tom. There's a, a idiomatic expression in English, called the rule of thumb. Now, does anybody does everybody know what that means? Or do they have an idea about concept? Not it's not quite right. 02:12 You can beat your wife with a rod as long as it wasn't larger than yourself. 02:15 Yes, that's the original derivative. Okay. And that's not what I'm gonna using it for. Okay. Nevermind. Yes, rough approximation is sort of the way I want to use this concept of rule of thumb. And so I'm going to talk about conventional science, which after Tom's talk, is actually just more of a rule of thumb, sort of, it's not, you know, the ultimate answer to think so I'm going to present this I hope in a way that shows you some interesting things, and we can get Oh, my goodness, look, it's really that thing. And then we're gonna go to the rule of tau, which is a different, which is different than the rule of thumb. Okay. So, what this is about has a little bit to do with the global consciousness project. Are you all familiar with the global consciousness project? You have an egg? Okay, that was breakfast project, do you think the global consciousness project or the foundation of the global consciousness project was started a couple decades ago, when some scientist began to notice an interesting anomaly, okay. And that anomaly was that if they used random event generators, sometimes called random number generators, some sort of what we think of as truly random device. And the conventional thinking is, is that science really depends on this randomness. I mean, the, the basis of physics is dependent upon this and all of our understanding, which is sort of a interesting thing, because I remember being in eighth grade, you know, eighth grade science, and they showed little pictures of electrons orbiting around neutrons and centers, and this that the other thing, and they were in this nice orbits doing just very precisely, and then there was valence, you know, there were, how many of them were there on this, that and so it wasn't until later I came to understand they really aren't in orbits, you know, they're like everywhere all the time until you observe them. And then you say, oh, there it is there, but that has no prediction as to where we'll be next time. So there's very foundational notion of this sort of indeterminate cloud or quantum positioning of this electron until you observed it. And so I sort of got my head around that a little bit, maybe sort of, kind of, and this randomness principle of you should be able to have devices that truly working on random like no Noise diodes and counting alpha particles as they climbed into the earth, that's all totally random by some conventional standards. And yet, when they monitored what they called focused consciousness or focused attention with these types of devices, suddenly they were less random, or what Tom talked about is, we expect this entropy, this chaos, but it became less chaotic, during focus states of awareness. And they, they now spread these all over the world. They're called a eggs, which are monitoring devices. And so we look at events like the Super Bowl, when millions of people watch their TVs and watch the Super Bowl. It isn't quite as random during that period of time, and we look at Princess die and find out when her accident happened, the news came up and everything. Randomness wasn't quite that way anymore, it became less random. So the idea is, is that there was something about human consciousness, at least they thought, so they had all these things about the monitor where the news was and where the news wasn't. And it seemed to have an idea of the more millions of consciousnesses that were paying attention to this event that affected this idea of the principles of physics itself, this idea of the randomness, location of particles, or the emission of photons, and so forth, and so on. So they began to do several kinds of different experiments on this. So what did this really mean? It didn't only happen in global events, you know, they don't even want to go to the fact that it happened at 911. And it happened before 911. We don't understand that. Let's just talk about that. Yeah, we don't want to deal with that. Secret cause and effect thing, you know, yeah, that's real. We focus on it, it changes. Oh, that's weird enough for us. That's not go any further than that. So the idea, then, is that they weren't thinking up different ways to test this. So they were taking different things that looked like focus concentration events, and sneaking a random number generator in there and seeing if that changed. The, you know, Maharishi Yogananda thing about changing the crime statistics, they would go and they'd meditate and the crime statistics was changed, were changed. Well, we can argue about measuring systems and get over into the rule of tow on that. But what they did is they took random number generators, and took them to the group and measured was there this collapse of entropy? Was there less randomness? When they did their meditations, not just measuring the crime statistics, it turned out there was. So they started looking at other things. And one of the things that Dean Raiden did down at the Institute of Noetic Sciences was to study jewelry healing, and as unary healing is a sort of specific kind of healing, where they mentally focused their intent to engender all the good things that are happening rather than a PacMan eat up the bad cancer, which is, it's more of a meditation for wholeness, and light and growth of everything. That's God's creation, so forth, and so on. So instead of, you know, let's go battle with the bad guys kind of thing. So jewelry healing has value that people testify to. So it was wondering about, well, what if we, you know, put a random number generator in there, again, the people not knowing, you know that there's a random number generator in there. Forget the idea of time, if they know in the future, they knew in the past, we won't go there because science doesn't work? Well, if you consider that factor. They don't know at the time that the experiment is going on. But there's a random number generator in the room where they're trying to heal. And so out in a Faraday kind of protected cage thing. They get some cancer cells from the lab and they saw the petri dish in half and they submit half of them to the jewelry healing technique and a Faraday cage inside the laboratory Institute and wedding sciences. And they do their magic healing on it. They take it back to the lab. And sure enough, there's actually a change in the grove cancer cells and oh, look at it's wonderful. Meantime, Dean is on the side, stuck a random number generator in the laboratory. And isn't it interesting, the random NISS collapsed, there was less randomness statistically significant. And last randomness while they were doing their meditation. But the egg down in San Francisco didn't change. They're like, huh, isn't it interesting? Maybe it's a localized phenomenon based on what's going on locally here, not always over the globe. So they, the studies then took a shift away from this global consciousness project of what spectacular events in humanity, airplane crashes, sports events, beauty pageants, Princess die 911, things that attracted this huge humanity interest that seemed to be changing the random number generators, maybe it could be more focused or more localized? Well, you know, here's the test of the meditators changing the crime statistics. And here's this thing they did with the healers. And this has been replicated in a lot of different ways. So, Dean Raiden, and I got together and said, I wonder, you know, there's this unique, calibrated, regulated, organized, structured event that happens here we call the gateway voyage, which numbers of people go through numbers of programs in the similar situation. And it happens in this building during this prescribed time. And then there are times when it doesn't happen in this building. Wouldn't it be interesting to study whether or not the act of going through the gateway voyage actually changes these random number generators similar to what we see in the global consciousness project? So Dean said, Yeah, that sounds like a plan. So that's what I'm going to talk about here for a little bit. So random entropy, between coherent mind thinking, the idea of remember, when Tom talked about the idea of, the more coherent you become, the less random activity, you have more influence and power or ability to do work, depending on how you want to talk about it. Being in a coherent state in a cohesive state seems to be better than being in a chaotic state. And there is this sort of, we call it group bonding that happens on Fridays. And, you know, people say, Oh, I don't know about all those stupid things people talked about on the Hemi sync, but boy, I really love the people we got together with and stuff. So there's something going on here that has to do with this building of the group thing. And we're wondering, is that measurable? Objectively measurable by some other means? So we're going to take a look at this correlation between the human event that goes on in a gateway voyage and sticking a random number generator in there at the same time them not knowing it, except they know it now. Because researchers published and if they know it, now they knew it then. And oh, nevermind. 13:04 So you kind of know a little bit about what randomness is all about. There's different definitions of it and a little symbol, you know, throwing the dice there. We don't have talked about randomness too much. So entropy, the idea that Tom talked about entropy is this. What physics concerns the normal course of systems in their in Tropic state? Okay. So there's been PK studies, where it seems to be that seems to be that people are able to alter randomness of devices by focusing their intent on it, you know, a simple kind of thing was you have a random number generator that's generating a stream of pixels every 200 times or it goes blip on the screen, another 200 goes by his BIP and you would expect those bits to wander up and down like you were flipping a coin heads and tails you wander up and down. But sometimes those little stream of BIP bit, sometimes they go bid bid bid. And they go outside of the boundary line that says this is where we would expect this line to wander back and forth within chance expectation. But what if all of a sudden it goes outside of that chance expectation and just keeps on going? You know, and there are rules of toe, which we'll talk about later that might