Markdown lines 938–1262 · Part 1 of 3
1976-09-07 TC
(This is an unedited transcript, auto generated by otter.ai.)
Pacific timetable for California quake, and said it was about three months from now.
And then I got a map of the United States,
particularly the western half the United States, and what it would look like afterwards. It's kind
of strange, because when I saw it, the map startled me a little bit, and then I was told that I was
mistaking the shading and was thinking that land was water and water was land. I had a
negative version of the map that I was being shown. I
and pretty much as we had had before, the disturbances in the east are slated for around 83
or four.
383, I asked when you would move from your prison house, and immediately got April.
Although I didn't get a year, I assume it's This year. I just got the months April. I
I know I did not, but I will, if you
like, and so that you can remember it and drop okay.
And I've been studying it and trying to fill in the detail. I shouldn't have any trouble at all
drawing it
Now, remember your invite that?
Yes, it has a strange feature to it, an indentation, almost like a V, A notch cut out of West
Central
United States. You
okay, excuse me reporting
the quake that's going to occur in about three months in California is not going to be the major
one. It's not going to be the worst one, although it will be
a major quake
by standards of people living there, and it will be very destructive, but there will be a worse one
coming about eight or nine months later. The rest of the US will experience light tremors,
nothing disastrous until about 83 or so went over about a one year period. Most of the
traumatic geological changes will take. Place. Meanwhile,
a
very unusually large number of earthquakes will be happening worldwide. What
Western Europe will shift southward toward Africa. The Mediterranean will shrink, will close up
to a large extent.
I see most of the change being taken around the in the Mediterranean area, Southern I
Europe. It
looks like most. It
looks like England and
that part of northern
and central Europe all survives. All right, it's just the whole thing gets shifted southward. Of
course, there are lots of changes that from a global viewpoint don't look that large, but I'm sure
from a local viewpoint will be quite significant and quite massive, but right now I'm looking at a
globe of the earth, and it's turning slowly, and as it turns, I See the changes. So I'm getting a
very
macroscopic view,
water opens up,
even though the Mediterranean is squished down to a smaller body of Water, it extends further
to the east and
covers the
it covers quite a bit of land. It's now to the east of the Mediterranean. And also, like through the
Suez Canal, the canal will become not really a canal anymore. It will open up to a larger body
of water. My view just got in real close there, and I need to back off and a little bit in so I can
take in The whole globe again. Telescope. Back out.
Okay? Pin lakes,
Black Sea, Caspian Sea, area that seemed to have grown much larger.
Most of Russia looks
unchanged on a again, on a global scale, which mostly is where the land mass exists, rather
than detail.
China and
Southeast Asia is altered quite a bit.
China in particularly I
me back off a little bit further. Seems like a great deal of southeastern China
well
exchange land for water and.
There will be new islands created and old ones submerged in general, throughout the oceans
and
Curious,
what are the economic Change
worldwide. Let's Start you.
Hey pardon give you a chance to get your recorder going. The political climate will be one of
the
uh administering
by a crisis resources and attention by the federal government and the political system will be
put toward the most demanding crisis of the moment, political or social programs won't be
planned and executed and ideas worked out. It won't be that type of thing like we've seen in
the past. It will essentially be a race from behind to catch up and keep up with with series of
crises, some of which, Of course, will be caused by the geological changes. I
I was working on a trying to get a a prediction on the presidential race in 76 I
and I didn't get a real strong indication, matter of fact, at first, Thor was being a little funny and
said it would be Gerald Carter. Then he was a little smug about that. I got a feeling that he's
not real anxious to get into that kind of information. But I if I pressed it a little bit, perhaps I
could, I could get that
generally,
a lot of crises, not all related to geological changes. Political crises, kind of a showdown
between the liberals and conservatives in economic and welfare and social programs versus
economic programs,
a
slowing of the rate of growth, economic growth in the country, maybe even a standing still for a
while. Now, that's what I see in the short term the next i.
Of three years or so, three or four years?
Well, I just asked again, and I kind of got the half hearted indication that Carter would win the
presidency and that he would not turn out to be the candidate that many people had voted for
him would expect of him, that he will turn out to be more fundamentally conservative than he is
picturing himself to the voters now, and this is, I suspect, what will create part of That
showdown between the social programs people and the I A
conservative.
So I guess that turns out to be a lot of political turmoil over the next few years. So
as more of the geological changes begin occurring, the mood will change from internal policies
and directions of the government towards the citizens, just to simple survival, and there will not
be a great deal of panic and
violence.
The events seem to have such a sobering impact that the vast majority of people will work
together
for a mutual benefit and to aid each other's chances of survival. Of course, there is still a small
criminal element. But
if anything, the the criminal side of life in the United States will be reduced considerably
because of the seriousness of the the seriousness that life will take on
worldwide, it will be a very politically
unstable.
Next three or four years,
a lot of changes in governments. I
in general, I just see a lot of political activity.
Again, when major devastation occurs, ideas will turn toward mutual help and survival and
away from political idealism or political power maneuvering,
people will begin to
depend less for their governments and more on each other, because their governments will
really be able to do very Little to help them or do anything for them. I
present and
no, it will become more local. There won't be as much long distance
interstate commerce and. The produce and materials of for housing and of course, food and
basic necessities that will be available on the area will come from closer by, rather than
ship. From long distances,
but there will still be commerce and and there will still be transportation and
well, actually, most of the sources that are available now will still be available, though, a great
deal of the energy production will be eliminated. So Well, a great deal of the consumers of that
energy.
So there the,
for example, the electric power generating facilities that will still be operating, well after of
course, some rebuilding and repair, be able to
serve
in a useful way to the consumers who still need that power
from the Yes,
but at a much higher price, there may be some sort of rationing. It may not be a free market
situation where one can buy what one can afford. I see as I look in, I still see cars and trucks
moving, but I do have a feeling of scarcity.
It as far as petroleum products go,
trouble is all that geological shifting has has played havoc with a great deal of the sources of
petroleum, places where it used to be, where they have facility for processing and pumps and
oils and so on. It, of course, would no longer be there. And other places may become sources
that were not sources before. So there will be petroleum, but it will be scarce, probably
rationed.
Solar energy and powering of individual dwellings will become much more popular and
widespread. Uh, instead of the central power production plant with a large distribution system,
there will be smaller power production or individual dwelling production.
After all of them, what
cry got was about 150 million i.
About 3 billion, but I have no feel for that number at all, whether that's smaller or larger or the
same as it is. Now, I do have a feel for the US population. 150 million is about 50 million less
than there are now i
Yeah, it's kind of strange. As I get this information, it's like there's a large Atlas, and as the
questions are asked, there is somebody turning the pages of the Atlas, and I'm essentially
reading the information.
What what You call my goal? I
there's several levels to that answer. On a physical level, the cause, I had a picture of a prune
as it dried out, wrinkling earth system changing its physical state for the loss of heat from its
core,
the
pressure the the core decreasing with the slow heat loss. And because of those decreasing
pressures, the matter of the Earth itself will need to adjust to accommodate those changes in
forces and pressures.
That's the physical side, sort of a scrunching up of the earth. I kind of have the feeling that
when it's all over the earth will be a little smaller in diameter, a little shorter in circumference,
just kind of scrunch up a little bit, collapse a little I guess, and all the geological activity on the
surface will be just like wrinkles
on A much larger view on a on a cosmic i
a perspective.
I don't really,
I don't really see an intent like that. This is happening, you know, because it is going to, you
know, do any specific thing, but I see that it's like part of the program on a cosmic view, it
will happen, and it will be a turn, A turning point, sort of like
a shaking up of people's awareness, an unsettling of lifestyles and attitudes, Just a general,
uh, shaking up, stirring the pot,
change in direction
that
hopefully when things settle down again, then they will have set up some. Settled down with
positive changes having taken place. But I don't really see that that's already determined that it
will be an overall positive experience. It may or may not be. It still depends on what is made of
it.
But I see that it has a larger
probability, say, of having a positive outcome in that when these lifestyles and attitudes and
feelings and essentially, reality view of the people settles after having been so shaken and
disturbed and and changed from its normal way, will probably settle down to more fruitful
reality system than we have now. But I don't, I don't see that as a as a fact that's already
determined, just as a the larger probabilities I
more like an opportunity,
like the shake up, forces new thinking through of things, and it's that opportunity that's really
presented. You
the more that people, that persons become in touch with their with themselves, the
more Positive
will this
readjustment and resettling of reality View become
the
legitimization of an inner self, and the importance of that inner self will help immensely When
pupils are so uprooted and the pot is stirred. This legitimization of inner space, so to speak, will
open the doorway for many people to react to The situation constructively,
and we fit in
to this by
helping bring about that legitimization and by, of Course, helping individuals get in touch with
their selves and
but it's not, it's,
it's not just the people that we help, individuals, of course, that will help those individuals
immensely, but it's, it's a larger thing than that. By. Helping these individuals, plus
the way ideas and acceptance of ideas spreads from a few to many, we will really be