← Library

SOURCE MARKDOWN

2006 Professional Seminar: RNG Entropy during the GATEWAY VOYAGE (F. Holmes “Skip” Atwater)

2006 · Source title

Open original source on Internet Archive ↗

This is existing source text. OCR and automatic-caption errors may remain. Collection notes and project summaries are excluded from this reader.

Recorded provenance: from_pdf · Quality: unknown. Use source-scoped search to inspect indexed evidence, or Ask for a cited summary.

2006 Professional Seminar- RNG Entropy during the GATEWAY VOYAGE (F. Holmes “Skip” Atwater) (Transcript).pdf

2006 · File heading in Markdown

ORIGINAL FILES

Open directly on Internet Archive in a new tab.

Markdown lines 677–867 · Part 5 of 6

Some people say it's a very good hot air. But I think I agree with you. There's more going on here. As we learn more about the effect of this than we thought we knew there's more going on. 57:08 You I mean, I think it would probably be useful to do the comparison, but you actually have some of that data you have. You have groups before they each time. Yeah. So within your data set, you have information on the group before they have done to me say the attempt is there, they're on this journey, but they haven't yet done it. And we have data from that. 57:36 And and you look at the global consciousness project, when something happens one community and it's not happening to the other community, the people are still there. But they're not focused on the fire and the barn, kind of a thing. So there's inference from that data, but not a nice, neat control package of what about the length of a passage is, 57:59 clearly when you stop the tape or something? You don't get a sudden, terrorist 58:04 drop, right? What about as long as the residual effect? It rounds back into normal, normal random 58:13 is a wonderful question that is in the data. And we got to find a graduate student to go look at that. We're obviously the data pile is deep with billions and billions of bits of information. And on the first study, we sliced it up in 30 minute segments. So we could look at this window and 30 minute clips, this data was not sliced in that way that this data is going to be around for years and years and years and years. And that's a really good indication of that any is the rise time to it? You know, not only is how long does it last after the focus 12 tape is the rise time to it as though some part of our consciousness knew that experience was coming for us. Lots of questions, job security. 59:01 Do you You did hear about the Maharishi Effect. Studies on this matter more or less? In the 70s? Yes, exactly. It's quite proven, isn't it? And you know, the effect lasted a few weeks afterwards. And they claim that you have 7000 people who meditate in his environment and religious or somewhere, then there's definitely a change into the whole consciousness, less crime rate and less disease and all this and I think this is available everywhere. 59:44 Instead of using random number generators, they looked at the indicators of society like crime rates and hospital admittance and so forth and so on and found that by going to an area and meditating in that area, they would lower those rates down. So it's an interesting thing going on. And they approached 1:00:04 the government and you know, when they were crisis, and they say, Why should we finance 7000 People just for a time to come down with no weapon and all this, just let them meditate and get the vibration, imbalance, but 1:00:35 just to have a look at this divergence grams data that we're seeing is popping up in other eggs as well. And of course, when you're looking 1:00:43 at, explain to them what an egg is, 1:00:46 this is the listening post. And we have one organization has one inside rich. And what we're finding Chris, when you look at the data from an individual listening post, statistically, you gotta be very careful because you're, you're just extracting one little bit. But they're finding that when there's an event, they look separately at the closest eggs, the closest listening post, and it's coming up, over and over. There was a plane crash in Cyprus in the summer, last year. And we'd had an ache in Cyprus, and there was one in Athens, which was closer to where the crash actually happened. And so we asked Roger Nelson at the global consciousness project to analyze the two closest x, and we got a very similar pattern, you get the high statistical deviation, but it wasn't unusual deviation. One went up, Athens went up, went down. Why we don't know. But it was an unusual divergence. And they also saw it with I think the Katrina hurricane with some of the local, the nearest eggs, right? Again, you had this opposite directions. So they are looking at it, the global consciousness project is examining this. It's part of sort of a sub data of something going on. We don't yet know what it is. But it seems that there's an effect. 1:02:11 And I just thought, as you were talking about, that I just had this wonderful idea for a science fiction book, the best science fiction books, take out a bit of the truth and then add some more to it. So you could take world energy crisis solved, because of this divergent effect. And so there's an energy difference between these two places. And there's always two places all over the world. But something's happening here. And something's happening here. And all we have to do is tap the energy difference between this and it's tapping consciousness for the energy that the world needs. Yeah. 1:02:52 It'd be interesting to have these things at random places. I think, an interesting another interesting experiment would be to have to play places that are equidistant from each other. And from the same 1:03:05 actually happens at 1:03:06 influencing this. Could you do the experiment without? Just play the tapes? 1:03:10 That's it? That is a 1:03:15 What about? Consider locality unconsciously 1:03:19 consciousness? Yes. 1:03:21 Because we were really field oriented at this point? Yes. Not what about letting go of this orientation and think all consciousness is non local? 1:03:32 Yeah, it becomes a problem to study in science when you do that. But I mean, we're saying oh, look, this is coincident with this event. Well, what if it is a non local space time thing happening, and we're only seeing an illusion of it being connected? 1:03:47 If you receive two dimensions, if we would see a different different dimension. 1:03:59 Agree, Agree. And fortunately, there's a lot of smart people looking at this situation. And I just feel really privileged that we're able here at the Institute to contribute this pool of data. It's just amazing. Now, I need to cut off the questions here and sort of make some point. What you brought up owl is really interesting here. Because this doesn't nest these random number generators in consciousness don't have to just be to do studies, you can actually do work with these are the ones you can take the software and program the software differently in terms of allowing the group to change the binaural beats that they have, because you can say when it's too many tails change the binaural beats this way when it's too many heads change the binaural beats this way. So you can have this very unique group biofeedback dynamic. A couple of the program's here have to do with thinking in group being involved in group rather than individual and that would be an ideal situation from this and then you Then one step further and you say, you could actually program the randomness to be related to, I hope I pronouncing this right. For gnomes, which have to do with pronounceable language, that can be random. And he was Yeah. Could you go back? lol My name is Bob. Okay, when random this collapses? Can it make intelligible language? And is this a possible Evie, you know, connection? Electronic Voice potential connection? Because it's true randomness altered to be non random anymore and actually create communications with the other side. Yes, it's I mean that we started out with that as a premise isn't really happening here. And now it seems to be in everybody's excited like, what if it really is happening, you know, when they want to test it again to see what really is happening. But in the long run, you can put this phenomenon to work not just to do studies, but to tap into information perhaps. So again, I have this study for people to look at, I guess we can leave it on the back table. So please don't run off with it. But you're welcome to peruse it and get some references offered so that you can, you know, try to understand a little bit more. The future I push that laser button instead of the Advanced button. A future of the r&g situation here is they want me to do this again. Do it again, skip. Okay. They would like me now to continue to monitor this. Looking back at once you collect the data, you look at the weaknesses in the share around the scientific community. And they say, Well, why didn't you do this, you could have done that you should have done this, why don't you do this. And so adapting all of those things coming up with a reasonable plan for doing this again. And so we want to collect more of the control situations more of the empty situations, with the exact same devices that are used locally and remotely over a fixed number of times and use those exact same devices, multiple devices, usually three devices, instead of just one device for monitoring the gateway voyage three devices simultaneously. And if the effects still happens with three entirely different devices measured simultaneously and the way in which they come up with randomness, then they'll scratch their heads and think of something else for me to do. But it's a very interesting adventure to continue, I'm going to have to get a little funding to do this because I need to buy some little bit better computers, not better than we have. But that isn't the handy dance that I'll be using for this project, a couple 1000 bucks and solve the issue to get you know identical laptops, that would run identical systems. So that later on you couldn't say oh, it was because of this or it was because of that and make everything as identical as we can in the whole situation. Plus what we talked about without not only just doing this, again, with more and better whiz bangs to see how real the effect is and how dependable the effect is, how powerful the gateway really is. But then begin to tap into this and use it for other things. The idea of unconsciously projecting into the quantum world in order to change the frequencies you're listening to is a fabulous idea for a group effort in what a bonding thing for Greek to happen. And then the idea of approaching this in a lifelines or an exploration 27, to see whether or not some of the things become would be coming through in an electronic voice potential kind of a way. Very interesting concept. So I now want to turn to in the last 10 minutes here to talk a little bit about a program called Star lines because I have just finished what I call the star lines report here. This is an ongoing work. So this is the first probably in a series of star lines projects. And it's been a very, very interesting thing for me to do. I went to the star lines line the second or third time, because I knew I was going to be studying all of the reports that everybody wrote, and I want to understand what was going on here. And then after I wrote the report, I thought this is cool. I want to go back again. So I went back again to the star lines program. How many people who have been to star lines have been destroyed islands? Not very many of you. Not very many of you. Interesting situation here. Some people think it's all about contacting et it's not. It's not at all. It's about using inner space to explore outer space. No, it isn't. It's about using outer space to explore inner space. Wait a minute, for the same thing. Oh my goodness. I don't need to go back the program again. I understand. I 1:10:01 think this is a very misunderstood seminar, you know, I never had any room or about any Monroe program, whatever it was all right, and testing and like this. And there are lots of rumors that it's not better not and it's not so good. And I never had this, but many of you noticing contact with many artists, or even people who never have been there, yeah. This is our new styles. Um, no, this is really not necessarily like this. So we need some more information. Okay. 1:10:37 That that is good feedback. Because those who have been to the program, like many of the