Markdown lines 199–334 · Part 2 of 6
deucing everything to experiment and do it now. Don't do it. Now. Maybe these things are
operating outside of time space continuum, the minutes gonna be really hard to study. So right
now we're just looking at observing what's going on here. Well, what is a random number
generator anyway, you can think of it simply as a coin flip something that's a random event can
I buy? If you're sitting here keeping track of heads, tails, heads, tails. And we went to staring
experiment or anything like that and focused our attention on you with that change the output,
simply by focus concentration of this, what's kind of hard to keep track of heads, and tails, you
can't do it very fast. It takes years and years and years to build up to in your data. So they
invent machines that can do that. And I sort of have a joke machine here that this isn't really a
machine. But I'm saying if you, you know, develop some sort of real complicated sort of device,
you could generate this random stream of events, and then test against it politically, a lot
quicker than having someone sit there and flip a coin and keep records as to what was going
on. So we need a device of some kind. Well, in reality, there are several kinds of devices. This
is a mind song device depicted up here. And it's about the size of this remote controller here.
The mind song device is an electronic noise generator, that works with the field effect
transistor. So it's just random electrical noise. And down here, the Orion device, just another
device, it looks at the quantum tunneling effects between two independent analog Zener
diodes. There's another kind of a device which I haven't used yet, but I now have in a
laboratory that looks directly at the half life of a descending grating atomic function. And like
radium in your watch, or something like that, it looks as it degrades, puts off particles
randomly. And this measures and counts those particles. And so it's not a device designed so
much like a diode or something like that. It's the actual atomic degeneration of a radioactive
device, which is sort of like it's easier to get your head around, the physicalness of it is much
more understood. It's like taking a tomato, everybody knows what a tomato is. So if you take a
piece of radioactive material, everybody knows it's disintegrating. And it's throwing off particles
and so forth in a random fashion. So a third level device here that might be worth trying to see
if it holds up in all types of devices, or is it a function, it's just designed just as an anomaly that
happens with certain types of devices. So let's look at the use of the mind song is what we
started with monitoring with the mind song. So let's go back and review a little bit about the
preliminary concept of what we did with the mind song here. First reported this last time, and
the idea was to let me back up a little bit, the idea was, is that we would put these into the
gateway voyage. There is, when you come to the Gateway voyage, if you remember, in the
white carpet room, there is this sort of fake shelf up high and on the right, and there are some
lights in it and stuff and wraps around where the wood stove is, and so forth, are tucked back
in there where you can't see, I would put one of these mines on devices. And supposedly, no
one knew the trainer's didn't talk about it. We found as the months went by, and people heard
about this, that there was news talk, and they said, Yeah, of course, you know, they're
monitoring human universal there and so forth. And so not that they understood what that
meant. But from a purist standpoint, we can't guarantee that nobody knew, and certainly as a
group, they're not informed. The trainers don't talk about it. And they don't say, No, everybody
hold you back, because they're monitoring, you know, the random number generator here.
They do not say anything about that this thing is just running by itself as time goes on. So the
idea was to monitor events. There. There's some precedents to this, rather than looking at a
global consciousness project and some sort of high interest thing like a presidential election or
a Super Bowl game or 911. What if you could recreate some sort of local coherence? Does
that happen locally? Nobody knew. So they began to try certain things, create local events,
during which the recipients did not know they would be monitored, where their environment
was being looked at, or the quantum randomness. You might think that candidates might be
Maharishi Yogananda and the idea of group healing As in cities where they were able to
reduce the crime rates, that might be a really good thing to monitor. And there are some
anecdotal but unpublished data about that. Another thing about healing when you get healers
together, and they do a healing, and you can prove in the laboratory with petri dishes and so
forth that a healing effect took place, well, maybe that'd be a good place to put a random
number generator. And they've done that the idea that the healers during the process, don't
know the random number generators, they are focusing their healing intent on the random
number generator, but on the petri dish, or the person, whatever. And sure enough, there is a
change in the quantum randomness. While that happens, again, be very careful about jumping
to cause and effect relationships here. Maybe the fact that the quantum randomness change is
what created the good healing effect, rather than the healer, creating the change, we just don't
know. It's a very strange thing happening. And we just don't know.
21:04
So we took the same idea. And look at the Gateway voyage, what is going on a gateway
voyage, it seems like a very interesting situation, we have all these people going through all of
these Hemi sync exercises at the same time, all supposedly coherently focused, during the
times of their exposure here, in an increased group bonding as they move through the week
seemed like an interesting place that maybe we should see whether or not it happens at the
Gateway voyage. So in our initial study, that's what we looked at. We looked at just putting that
in, in the gateway voyage. And what we looked at across the week, then was, Are there
interesting things that happened anywhere at odds of 1000 to one occurred on the first
morning, the first full day, roughly when the cablecar wake up was playing. And what that
means is, and this was across five different classes you take, you monitored all the data in one
class and all the data on the other class, and then you lay these things together. And look, is
there something that's so powerful that's happening across all the classes done by different
trainers on different dates, and nobody knows they're being monitored? Okay. So yeah, the
first time they heard cablecar wire or something. I don't know if it was a coherent dislike for
cablecar. What it was, but there were certainly focused coherence at that point in time. The
second event was the intro to focus 12. That was kind of an interesting thing for us to look at.
In the third event with reconvening after the first day, it's afternoon session, they're gonna
change. The fourth event was the vibe flow effect, which some of you may have heard about,
before, the idea that on day three, or day four, day four, is the bipolar event, which there are
three exercises that morning. And one of them being divided flow exercise. And it looked like
from the data at that time that that was very powerful, there was kind of a, through some
marching along getting very interesting, better and better. But across five classes, there was
this bump that seemed to happen. And it seemed to happen. We have wide flow across many
of the things, although we were depending upon the trainers to enter in the start times for the
exercise, so that we could try to get a hack mark on when things would begin. And of course,
that would shift depending upon what's going on in the classes and who's asking questions.
And then a trainer might think, you know, we probably ought to switch the order of these tapes
this way, and so forth. So there was a sense of coherence, at least towards the biplane, and
we were pretty excited about that. And the fifth event had to do with super sleep, the day of the
vibe flow as though something carried over that evening into super sleep that day. So those
were all interesting things. However, let's look at this. The analysis were based on comparing
what randomness should have been in the gateway voyage based not on another random
number generator, but on a mathematical projection of randomness. Saying here we have a
random number generator, and we have this mathematical ideal concept of what randomness
is, okay? And this seems to be drifting away from that mathematical ideal. It's also based only
on the first 200 bits of data, meaning that, you know, every second listening collects 1000s of
bits of data. But in the old days, when computers couldn't compete and store things, a
standard was established, just pay attention to the first To the bits and throw everything else
away pay attention, the first 200 bits in this one second threatening way, pay attention to the
first 200 bits in the second throw everything else away. So I just want to understand the
limitations of that it was done just on the first 200 bits of data and against an idealized or it's
kind of like looking up in a book a random number, is it on page 713, here's a table of random
numbers and you go like that, and say I have my random number, because I looked it up in the
book, rather than sort of generating it live based on a similar kind of condition. So the
preliminary study had to do with some limitations and ideas, or at least understanding what we
were actually measuring here. There were some phenomenal things that happened, statistical
variations that were really terrific. Based on what were all based on this, based on this, based
on this specific event markers, again, were entered by the trainers. So although it looked to us
like it was the anomaly of the fourth day and God flow, the markers were offset from each
other. And there were some trainers who forgot to put in the market, and so forth and so on.
What you'll find out happens later, when you do more and more and more and more programs
that shift in the 15 minutes this way, or half an hour this way, when take this way, tends to
even out that big giant peak. As you collect more data, it tends to even it out the assumption
without any sick exercises done the same time, same kind of a situation, looking at where
these things were caused. Now in the current study, we were talking about just a little bit here,
it looked at the data differently. Okay, we saved the data from the preliminary study, and did
some more work with adding some parameters, adding another random number generator and
adding some different things and looked at all the data streams the other way, in this concept,
just conceptually, we had one random number generator running in the Nancy Pen Center
where I told you another one over in the Bob in our research lab, and run up at Roberts
mountain retreat. And out of those 12 Gateway village workshops monitored with these
devices in place, we also did a to calibration runs, meaning that while there was no seminar
going on, I monitored that week, just like there was no seminars going on. And all of the
statistics which are now present, you have their basis based on these calibration runs, then not
on a mathematical table, or an ideal representation of what randomness should have been.
But upon these eight runs, as though you know, we put a thermometer in this swimming pool
and monitored the temperature here, rather than saying normal was 98.6, you know, is just
balanced everything against the idealized 98.6. We're actually sticking with thermometer in this
environment and say, This is what the random world looks like, here, but our seminar going on.