← Library

SOURCE MARKDOWN

1993 Professional Seminar: Hemi-Sync as Support for Style Flexibility (Jim & Charlene Ackenhead)

1993 · Source title

Open original source on Internet Archive ↗

This is existing source text. OCR and automatic-caption errors may remain. Collection notes and project summaries are excluded from this reader.

Recorded provenance: from_pdf · Quality: unknown. Use source-scoped search to inspect indexed evidence, or Ask for a cited summary.

1993 Professional Seminar- Hemi-Sync as Support for Style Flexibility (Jim & Charlene Ackenhead) (Transcript).pdf

1993 · File heading in Markdown

ORIGINAL FILES

Open directly on Internet Archive in a new tab.

Markdown lines 195–327 · Part 2 of 6

up over and over and over and over again in terms of people's ability and flexibility, and so on. And I found those to be particularly helpful me in terms of dealing with the discomfort when my style is someplace that's not natural for us. And hopefully, you'll get a little bit of a handle on that as we move along. Now, I also propose the possibility that we may even carry that that style or some of the elements of our personal style into altered states. And I suspect having heard Susan report on her experiences, knowledge states before that our style impacts the way we represent what we experienced there. Now I tend to be a little bit cautious style wise, which you may not be able to believe from what I'm doing now. But I know when I do anything like that I'm into analysis of everything that's going on while I'm doing it. And that's also very consistent with my style and sort of a conscious place. So that's something that I'm proposing that I just kind of like you to sort of be aware of. And if if you have any thoughts on that, I really like to hear what you think about that. Because because I think it probably gets in my way, the fact that I have a certain kind of a style and kind of thinking gets in my way as I go into exploring alternate states or alternate energies or whatever. Okay, so the next thing we do is we basically talk to people about responsibility in terms of finding some power, and I'm big on cartoons, I use this one here, you know, and this is the one loser. Now if you can read or not. The first one says black not doing the salad again, what's the problem? Forney says I hate tuna salad. The next one is to sell tuna salad every day, it's tuna salad for lunch, I'm sick of it, I can't force down another bite. And it's easy, big guy, if that's what you feel about, uh, once you have let us make something else for lunch. And of course, Donnie says I can't, why not? I make my own lunches. And that's, that's where we find that people are, you know, it's like we have this sense of powerlessness. But we got to remember that nothing's going to happen if we don't take personal responsibility. Another concept that I feel like people and I try to use this to soften them up for for change. And that is basically looking at the history of knowledge. And I pointed out to them, the least according to some sources, from when I started my career in education, approximately 30 years ago. And now, the difference in terms of the history of knowledge, just like it's moved from doubling every 15 years, to doubling approximately every year and a half. Now, if that isn't enough to blow you right off your perch. I don't know what it is. And when you're in education, and you're making decisions about what are you going to teach to these kids, and how many times are you going to repeat it and how much of it is going to have to be factual knowledge versus processes in terms of how to learn if that doesn't show He woke up in terms of the need for change, I, for one, don't know where else to start. So we work pretty hard on that with people, then we suggest the possibility is that maybe people want to sort of further in their own life have a framework for how they operate, and keep looking at whether it's making any sense or not. And by that, I mean, it's kind of like Morris Massey says, you know, some people, their whole life is a pile of crap. And the one consistent factor in their whole life is them, that their screw up button is, in essence, on repeat, and they just haven't bothered to pay attention to them. So we're suggesting that people come and try to get a grip on their model for life, not that it stays the same all the time. But then it keeps changing and the DNA changes. And based on what works, you do more of what is not supportive of you, you do less up. So I sort of had an idea about some pieces about that. And this is my ultra simplistic for this piece. Outline. We saw people and remember, we're working with mainstream, we're not normally working with strange folks like you who know that there's more to it than this. Okay? We basically say that there's an image you create, externally. And it's kind of like, Why did I do that? If you've ever had that, you know, you've done something sort of spontaneously and then you go, when you say, Oh, my God, why did I do that? You know, well, that's part of your style, oftentimes. And so we say that that's one part of you, that that impacts how you're going to be in the world. The other part of you is who has a little voice in my head, where did it come from? We talked about that your values and belief system, which is impacted by culture, and all that to say that you should get a handle on both of those pieces, in order to increase your probability of success. And this, this has been validated for me personally, in terms of my life, in terms of working with high school kids in whether it's in academics, or whether it's in athletics, and we actually had a wrestler, who was who had everything he was supposed to have the win, except he would lose, he lose by one or two points in real close matches, and we use this system to to get him to take a look at his style. And what we got out of it was that he got real intimidated by crowds, once he got a handle on, and it was a stylish, and once he got a handle on that, then we use some affirmations with him. And then he started winning. It's like he had the technical stuff, he had the commitment, he had the muscles, he did all the stuff you're supposed to do. But the crowds bothered him. And it was a style issue. So we worked from the style piece to that. So we tried to try to get people to take a look at both of these things. Normally, we work with one piece at a time. The first piece is the style piece, that's the external piece. It's like how people see you coming across, are you an outgoing kind of a person are you laid back kind of a person and a lot of research about this. And I frankly, don't debate the research with people, this is a simple tool. You don't have to be like a licensed psychologist to use it. It's very nice, commonplace tool, then I say, once you've got a handle on that, then you're in a position to look up. What are other kinds of processes you want to use, you know, what kind of process to use in your classroom, do you do you do management by objectives do do site based management would be TQM, or continuous quality improvement or whatever those things. To me, if you don't have a handle on this, the rest of this stuff is much more difficult to do. So that's kind of the nature of where we go with that. And then we talk about style. And this way, we're gonna use a thing called a personal profile system. But as I've taught rudimentary psychology courses, and I know there are people in here with broader credentials than I have in that, what I began to see is that people talk about this in a lot of different ways. He talks about in terms of personal profile, personality, style, personal style, behavioral tendencies, I sort of kind of group all those together and don't get too complicated with it. And I look at it in terms of those things are going to have a high impact on these things, your leadership style, your support style, and your participation style, which have to do with how well you're going to be able to get along in groups, and how are you going to be able to get along in relationships. Because in when I talked about groups and getting things done today, it's like, the idea of the group seems to be no, the team seems to be getting synergy and bringing people's ideas together to solve problems. And then that kind of a setting, everybody gets to be a leader at one time or the other in the most effective ones. So knowing what your style is, and how you may tend to show up as a leader is kind of valuable. And then at the same token, since the leadership rotates, so does being a participant or a support person. So you need to take a look at how your style shows up in that role. And that kind of gives you an overall look at your general participation, then that translates into contribution to team and relationship success. And everything that we say about this is 19:45 as important in a person's personal life, as it is in their professional life. You know, I've been dragging myself around doing this stuff for a long time. And what I keep finding is this generic is generic is generic, you know, it's like it's not business or education or It's generic. So, and that seems to get people that come to seminars, and then our guy said to another one on our seminars, you know, good lord. But when they heard us, it might actually, you know, have something to do with how I get along with my spouse, or my kid, or in my church council, or maybe pay a little bit more attention. So we work with that. And then of course, we acknowledge that sometimes people get, you really got to get into this one, people get a little nervous when they're talking about personal stuff. Don't ever walk in front of one of those as long as it's trying to get out of the way. So you can see this says they're all suspected someone that once again slipped on the screen with the concave side reversed. Now, that took me a long time. What was wrong with that? It sounds to me like a little bit like paranoia. And sometimes people get paranoid when you tell them, You're gonna give them a style, personality style thing. And I don't want you to be paranoid. But what I want you to know is just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you right. This particular instrument will not measure your, whether you're schizophrenic or paranoid or anything like that. But it is good to know that if you're schizophrenic, you'll always have each other crease from Taylor gave me that line told me that was that was okay to use. I figured if it came from a priest, at least I wasn't going to get criticized too bad. So anyway, it was some of the things that style seems to affect how you learn how you choose to learn some styles prefer to learn actively, some passively, hopefully, you'll get a sense of that as we go along how you teach, or how you facilitate a workshop will differences in terms of your personal style. And of course, the receptiveness to that in terms of the audience, or the group you're working with, has to do with how your style interacts with bears. So that's going to try to give you a feel for that has to do with expectations, how you prioritize If you bother to prioritize at all, whether you care about goals, or whether you're heavily involved in goals, the ways you communicate, some styles are like good confront errs, not necessarily naturally good listeners, others are just the opposite. The more that you have a handle on, I think the higher your probability for successes, whether it's in groups, or whether it's dealing with individual clients and understanding individual clients. I gotta tell teachers, when people come in for parent conference, their style has, their personal style has a lot to do with what to expect from you. Some people come in expecting to see a gradebook with a whole bunch of percentages on it, and a formula for arriving at how their kids get their grade. And if you don't have that you're not doing the job. Other people come in and nothing out of their style. What they want to know most is Do you like their kid? Is their kid getting along with everybody, because that's their sort of orientation to life. So it's really interesting how it affects that. It's also kind of interesting that some people actually choose their jobs based on style. If you think part of politicians, at least in this country, we seem to charisma seems to be an issue, which may be a style characteristic. Paul Tsongas was running for the Democratic nomination. There was a lot of dialogue about him when he was