Markdown lines 332–378 · Part 1 of 1
IMEC (Marie Coble) with “Friends”
May 1, 1986
Session 181: A different entity related to the gathering
Original Question: Who are you or what are you?
Summary: We are an energy in a separate reality. Is the gathering related to a purpose
or intent to join with us? We seek out other realities to expand our consciousness. We
can do this without the experience of actually participating. We study the workings of
what you have called the universes.
We do not use sound for communication as you do.
How do you communicate with one another?
Energies can be distributed and combined in many ways. Our way of communication is
by a combination of the uncreated force. We are not separated such as your physical
bodies but exist in a form of energy that has the ability to interpenetrate with each other.
We have connections to all of us but maintain our individuality. Any new information is
known to all simultaneously.
Is this interconnection that we are trying to learn with nonverbal training?
The response is a description of the development of communications with objects and
entities on the earth plane.
Initial efforts have been made to communicate with humans, animals, vegetation, and
even solid objects. All at the level of energies. Interpenetration with humans was
uncomfortable to them, so we shifted to observing from the “outside.”
Exploration of the energetic emanations. What was first perceived as random was later
found to be “sounds.”
The perception of the human universe was observed to be different when viewed from
the outside of the human entity and from the inside as the entity perceives it.
Not all universes are constructed as ours.
Desire to interface with this entity’s universe.
There are protective energies that surround each of the universes that make it difficult to
do so.
Other comments: In the debrief, it was made clear that this was a different entity,
confirmed by both IMEC and Warren. This happened without any apparent intent on the
part of IMEC or Warren and was surprising to them. The language style is different from
Friends, much more straightforward and less circuitous.
Report by Jim Lane