← Library

SOURCE MARKDOWN

(TMI-ARMY Files) 1985 - CENTER LANE Information Papers for Director, Defense Intelligence Agency

1985 · Source title

Open original source on Internet Archive ↗

This is existing source text. OCR and automatic-caption errors may remain. Collection notes and project summaries are excluded from this reader.

Recorded provenance: none · Quality: unknown. Use source-scoped search to inspect indexed evidence, or Ask for a cited summary.

1985-03-07 CENTER LANE Information Papers for Director, Defense Intelligence Agency.pdf

1985-03-07 · File heading in Markdown

ORIGINAL FILES

Open directly on Internet Archive in a new tab.

Markdown lines 479–817 · Part 2 of 4

1. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) The total cost for INSCOM's use of psychoenergetics for intelligence purposes, less personnel salaries for FYs 1979 through 1983 was $686K. In 1979, the total cost to INSCOM was $87K, $75K of which went to SRI-International for orientation training. In 1980, INSCOM's costs for the project were only $32K and there were no external contracts. In 1981, funding levels were increased to permit INSCOM to participate in the Joint Services GRILL FLAME Program with DIA. O£ the $205K spent in 1981, $190K went to external contracts with SRI-International in support of the joint services program. 1982 was the second and last year of INSCOM's support to the joint services program due to Congressional restrictions placed on the use of NFIP funds. Of the total $242K costs for 1982, $125K was spent in support of this joint services effort and $99K spent on word processing equipment. The $121K FY 1983 budget saw the beginning of the new coordinate remote viewing training at SRI-International at a cost of $36K, expansion of advanced training under a consultant services agreement with Mr. Robert Monroe of the Monroe Institute of Applied Sciences, Faber, Virginia at a cost of $24.4K, and the expenditure of $40K for additional word processing equipment. SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS CLASSIFIED BY: CDR, INSCOM DECLASSIFY ON: OADR copy}? oF £2 copiEs COCCRET Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 --- PAGE 15 (OCR) --- Pe Ae ee Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 ~~ wt tee 6 IAGPA-F-SD 10 Oct 84 SUBJECT: CENTER LANE Funding (U) 2. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) In FY 84 CENTER LANE received $496.5K in P-6 funds through the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Research, Development and Acquisition) and $315K INSCOM S&IA funds to continue the project's efforts. The P-6 funds were used in these areas: a. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) Purchase of biomonitoring equipment to be used to determine physiological changes during the conduct of psychoenergetic tasks. (Effort cancelled, $26.5K returned to DA) b. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) Development of a state-of-the-art psychological screening/selection profile for use in identifying potential sources. Such a profile would identify personnel who may have some psychoenergetic talent or who could be trained to perform psychoenergetic functions. The profile will be used to assist in the recruitment of new sources. c. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) Determine the countermeasures potential of extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic radiation. This effort will examine the possibility that certain as yet unidentified ELF radiations have a detrimental effect on mental states critical to psychoenergetic performance. This study may also provide information on BLF environments conducive to optimum psychoenergetic performance. The logical follow-on to this effort would be the development of local counter- countermeasures environments for CENTER LANE sources. d. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) Development of a new psychoenergetic technique for use in "search problems." Over the years, sponsor agencies have asked for assistance in locating lost or missing equipment or personnel. Because this is not a conventional remote viewing task, we have had little success at providing timely usable intelligence in these cases. That is not to say that information we provided was inaccurate, just that it was not directly usable to resolve the intelligence problem at hand. If in fact a new psychoenergetic "search problem" technique is developed, source personnel will likely be trained in this technique, since "search problems" continue to be priority tasks received by this office. e. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) Continuation of coordinate remote viewing training (CRV) at enhanced levels for one source. f. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) Initiation of CRV training for four new source personnel. 3. (S/CL-1/NOFORN) INSCOM awarded a contract to SRI-International on 15 November 1983 to perform work described in para 2b-f above. The INSCOM S&IA money was used to pay for SECRET Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 --- PAGE 16 (OCR) --- —_— Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 OLVIVE! IAGPA-F-SD 10 Oct 84 SUBJECT: CENTER LANE Funding (U) travel costs associated with our training programs, Project Manager's travel costs in performance of his COTR and management duties, and office administrative costs. $51K S&IA monies have been allocated to CENTER LANE for the first quarter of FY 85. LTC Buzby/AVN 923-2656 SECRET Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 --- PAGE 17 (OCR) --- Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 TAB Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 --- PAGE 18 (OCR) --- —_- rh Pe Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 We bee wr INFORMATION PAPER TAGPA-F-SD 10 Oct 84 SUBJECT: GRILL FLAME Evaluations (U) ISSUE: (S/CL-1/NOFORN) To Provide the Director, DIA with a summary of evaluations conducted on GRILL FLAME/CENTER LANE activities. FACTS: 1. (S/NOFORN) In June 1979, Dr. LaBerge, then Under Secretary of the Army, suggested that a scientific evaluation committee be appointed to review the Army's parapsychological activities. In early July 1979, Dr. Ruth Davis recommended that because of the special interest of the Secretary of Defense, that the committee review the total DoD posture. The mission of the committee, known as the "GRILL FLAME Scientific Evaluation Committee" was as follows: a. (S/NOFORN) To review the parapsychological research, investigations, and applications within DoD and the Intelligence Community. b. (S/NOFORN) To assess the validity of claims made for the alleged existence of the PSI phenomena, with particular emphasis on the experiments which were instituted to approach the "proof of principle." c. (S/NOFORN) To recommend a course of action for DoD in future parapsychological activities. SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS CLASSIFIED BY: CDR, INSCOM DECLASSIFY ON: OADR copy_| oF 2 copies SFCRET Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 --- PAGE 19 (OCR) --- Arran r nT Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 ar eee ee ITAGPA-F-SD 10 Oct 84 SUBJECT: GRILL FLAME Evaluations The Committee, chaired by Mr. Manfred Gale, published their report in December 1979. Among the recommendations made by the Committee was the following: "Operationally-oriented RV activities aimed at determining the empirical value of RV to intelligence should continue." 2. (S/NOFORN) On 23 August 1982, Rep. Edward P. Boland, Chairman, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), requested that a comprehensive report be prepared documenting the results of the DoD three year GRILL FLAME project and that it be submitted to the HPSCI not later than 15 October 1983. In response to this request, the Assistant Deputy Director for Scientific and Technical Intelligence, DIA, assembled an independent Scientific Evaluation Team. The team was to produce a report that would: a. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Discuss the methodology and findings of the research effort to include all relevant statistical analyses on remote viewing trial applications. b. (S/CL-2/NOFORN) Address appropriate recommendations for future research or operational applications of parapsychological phenomena. INSCOM has not received a final copy of the report, but did receive a copy of the final draft of the report. Although the Scientific Evaluation Team did not examine INSCOM'S operational program, the following extracts from their recommendations seem appropriate: "The evidence shown to us is too impressive to dismiss as mere coincidence. Certain similarities between the SRI and Princeton results, obtained in very different circumstances by unrelated investigators, are particularly compelling. ...Exploration of the phenomenon should not be restricted to specific applications. ...It is our conclusion that Dr. Puthoff's team (SRI International) warrants cautious continued fiscal support." 3. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) The Defense Intelligence Agency published the results of their three year, $1.5 million psychoenergetic research effort on 19 October 1983, with significant recommendations that INSCOM'S operational remote viewing project continue. LTC Buzby/AVN 923-2656 SECRET Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 --- PAGE 20 (OCR) --- Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 A TAB Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 --- PAGE 21 (OCR) --- Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 SEURC! INFORMATION PAPER IAGPA-F-SD 10 Oct 84 SUBJECT: CENTER LANE Personnel Selection Procedures (U) ISSUE. (U) To provide the Director, DIA with a history of CENTER LANE personnel selection procedures. FACTS: 1. (S/CL-3/NOFORN) In December 1978 and January 1979, 251 INSCOM personnel in the greater Baltimore/Washington, D.C. area were considered for participation in the INSCOM GRILL FLAME Project (IGFP). These 251 individuals were experienced in the intelligence disciplines of SIGINT, PHOTINT and HUMINT and represented more than 8 units/organizations within INSCOM. Of the 251 individuals considered, 117 were interviewed by IGFP management personnel under the guise of a "survey" to determine attitudes about the possible use of psychoenergetic phenomena (parapsychology) in the intelligence field. The large difference between number considered and number actually interviewed was due to the following elimination factors applied by IGFP personnel: a. (U) Commander's evaluation. b. (U) Retainability - at least 20 months. c. (U) Health. d. (UU) Not hand available (programmed TDY, schools, etc.). SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS CLASSIFIED BY: CDR, INSCOM DECLASSIFY ON: OADR copy | oF 2 COPIES SECRET Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 --- PAGE 22 (OCR) --- Approved For Release 2007/10/23 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001500040002-0 OLVINL | TAGPA-F-SD 10 Oct 84 SUBJECT: CENTER LANE Personnel Selection Procedures (U) During the selection process, IGFP management personnel were looking for individuals who were open minded, adventurous, above average intelligence, mature and stable, "artistic" in character and personality, successful, well thought of by self and co-workers articulate, sensitive, and had an ability to "in-flow" data. These characteristics were provided by Stanford Research Institute (SRI) International, Menlo Park, CA. SRI- International personnel stated essentially that no definite profile had been established, but that their experience showed that successful subjects (remote viewers) normally possess some of these characteristics. During the interview phase of the selection process, consideration was also given to individuals who related their own previous psychoenergetic experiences. Individuals who had objections to the military use of psychoenergetics were not considered for final selection for the IGFP. Additionally, individuals who displayed an unreasonable enthusiasm for psychoenergetics, “occult fanatics", and "mystical zealots" were not considered for final selection. Of the 117 individuals interviewed, one refused to talk about psychoenergetics at all, three thought that most of what they had heard was nonsense or trickery, three were opposed to the investigation of psychic phenomena on religious grounds, and 110 had favorable opinions towards psychoenergetics and the possible use of psychic phenomena in the military. With 94% of the people interviewed showing favorable attitudes for the IGFP, it was obvious that further screening was necessary to reduce this